Dismantle Civilisation Rotating Header Image

July, 2008:

our cry for cheap oil is crude and deadly

The reality of what you are asking for, when you demand the UK govt do something about the price of oil, by Johann Hari in the Independent.

When you cry for cheaper oil, do you know what you are really asking for? Gordon Brown has just shown us. He has unwittingly exposed the pipeline that runs from your petrol station to the poisoned people of the Niger Delta. The more you howl for cheap oil, the more they will be Shell-shocked into submission.

To understand, you need to know the story of the Niger Delta, a once lush land of mangrove swamps at the base of Nigeria. In the late 1950s, in the final days of British imperial rule, Shell’s local subsidiary discovered it lay on top of vast pools of oil. Britain immediately became its number one user, with the US close behind. In the long decades since, more than $200bn worth of oil and gas has been pumped from beneath the Delta people’s feet.

So you would imagine the Niger Delta must now be an oasis of riches, with its 30m people bathing in wealth. But no: they live with nothing and die by the age of 40. While the lifeblood of twenty-first century techno-life is pumped from their land, they live in the Stone Age, with no schools, no hospitals and barely any electricity. They have felt three effects from the petrol. Their land has been poisoned by oil spills; the fish they lived off have been turned into stunted, toxic rarities; and when they ask for compensation, they are shot at.

Two hundred billion dollars, stolen from the people of Nigeria.

Enter Gordon Brown. Last week, he offered Britain’s help to achieve the second option. He offered British troops to “train” Nigeria’s “security forces” so they can “restore order” and get the oil flowing fast again.

Why did he choose this? Because compromise would take time and – if the people of the Delta really got to keep a share of the profits – it would cost. Oil prices here won’t come down. That’s no good: he is being screamed at by us to deliver cheap oil, whatever the human cost, today, tomorrow, and forever. He is reacting to pressure from you. Heroin addicts will rob grannies for their next fix; oil addicts like us will plunder Africa and the Middle East.

No doubt Brown will say the British soldiers would also provide human rights training to Nigerian soldiers. But the reason Nigerian soldiers are there is to suppress the local people so their oil can be seized. How do you slather human rights training on top of a mission like that?

An old woman from the Delta tries, in the new American documentary Sweet Crude, to talk directly to you. She says: “I’d like people all over the world to realise there’s a segment of humanity suffering as a result of oil production – ordinary men, women, children. They should think about them and not think simply of energy. Think of us as people. That’s more important than anything.”

But while we are unrepentant junkies, howling for cheap petrol, will we be able to hear her?

This is just one example of how our civilised lives have impoverished others lives. Think about where the resources you use comes from. As oil runs out, and prices increase, do we want to see the oppression and exploitation increase? Or could we live without our companies stealing resources from the rest of the world?

Share

guerilla gardener

Just do it!

Share

keeping fed

Another excerpt from Dmitry Orlov’s book.

In addition to small-scale farming, forests in Russia have always been used as an important additional source of food. Russians recognize and eat just about every edible mushroom variety and all of the edible berries. During the peak mushroom season, which is generally in the fall, forests are overrun with mushroom pickers. The mushrooms are either pickled or dried and stored, and often last throughout the winter.

In spite of the monumental failures of Soviet agriculture, the overall structure of Soviet-style food delivery proved to be paradoxically resilient in the face of economic collapse and disruption. The combination of local food stockpiles administered by politicians conditioned to treat bread riots as career-ending calamities, the prevalence of government institutions that attended to the sustenance of their employees and plenty of kitchen gardens, meant that there was no starvation and very little malnutrition. But will fate be as kind to the United States?

Probably not. Europeans may be a little better prepared, although the UK is in the same boat and same corporate stranglehold as the USA.

In the United States, most people get their food from a supermarket, which is supplied from far away using refrigerated diesel trucks, making them entirely dependent on the widespread availability of transportation fuels and the continued maintenance of the interstate highway system. In an energy-scarce world, neither of these is a given. Most supermarket chains have just a few days’ worth of food in their inventory, relying on advanced logistical planning and just-in-time delivery to meet demand. Thus, in many places, food supply problems are almost guaranteed to develop. When they do, no local authority is in a position to exercise control over the situation and the problem is handed over to federal emergency management authorities. Based on their performance after Hurricane Katrina, these authorities are not only manifestly incompetent, but also appear to be ruled by the ethos that it is better for the government to deny services than provide them, to avoid creating a population that is dependent on government help.

Many people in the United States don’t even bother to shop and just eat fast food. The drive to maximize profit while minimizing costs has resulted in a product that manipulates the senses into accepting as edible something that is mainly a waste product. Under strict process control procedures, agro-industrial wastes, sugar, fat and salt are combined into an appealing presentation, packaged, and reinforced by vigorous advertising. Once accepted, it beguiles the senses by its reliable consistency, creating a lifelong addiction to bad food. The chemical industry obliges with an array of deodorants to mask the sickly body odor such a diet produces. Immersed for a lifetime in a field of artificial sensory perceptions, dominated by chemical, man-made tastes and smells, people recoil in shock when confronted with something natural, be it a simple piece of boiled chicken liver or the smell of a healthy human body. Perversely, they do not mind car exhaust and actually like the carcinogenic “new car smell” of vinyl upholstery.

When people do cook, they rarely cook from scratch, but simply re-heat prepackaged factory-produced meals. When they do cook from scratch, the supposedly fresh ingredients come from thousands of miles away and are selected for ease of shipping rather than any actually desirable qualities, making them woody or pulpy and only barely edible. Since good taste is no longer on the menu, the focus shifts to quantity, resulting in appallingly sized portions of undifferentiated protein and starch drowned in fat, administered in national festivals of pathetic gorging, of which Thanksgiving seems to be the main one. But this is all good for business and keeps the cancer, diabetes and heart disease industries humming. This is all very unhealthy, and the effect on the nation’s girth is visible clear across the parking lot. A lot of the people, who just waddle to and from their cars, seem unprepared for what is coming next. If they suddenly had to start living like Russians they would blow out their knees. Most of them would not even try, but simply wait, patiently or impatiently, for someone to come and feed them. And if that food arrives and consists of a styrofoam box containing a puck of pseudo-meat between two pucks of pseudo-bread and a plastic bottle of water laced with pseudo-syrup, they would be satisfied.

But the food may never arrive. There is already a fair amount of hunger in the United States and many families are forced to choose between food and gasoline. Gasoline is the greater of the two necessities, because it is necessary for them to drive to buy food: their car always gets to eat first. In the future, the choice will be made for them: they will be priced out of the market, their food used to produce ethanol, so that the more fortunate can keep driving their cars a tiny bit longer. The process of starving them out might go by one of the euphemistic terms economists seem to favor, such as the somewhat sinister “demand destruction,” or the more bland “load shedding.” This process is already underway in Mexico, where corn masa producers who provide a staple purchased by the poor are squeezed out by the ethanol producers. The United States is next. Who is that skeleton driving a pickup truck? Let us hope it is not you, but someone else — someone less fortunate than you, with whom you are not acquainted.

Share

food storage 102 – 2 weeks is not enough

more sound advice from Sharon Astyk.

Last time I ran the food storage class, I started off with a Food Storage 101 post that discussed the bare minimum for food storage – the 2 weeks recommended by both the US Department of Homeland Security and the American Red Cross. I reviewed the fact that 2 week extended periods in which we are unable to shop or get supplies are actually not at all uncommon – that they have occurred many times in rich world nations including the US, and that all of us should, as simply commonsense preparedness, have a 2 week supply of food. I then went along trying to get you all to store much more food than that, but I didn’t want to push too hard on that, because I know that for some people, the idea that you might not be able to get food at the store for more than a couple of weeks due to a short-term disaster is just plain crazy talk.

But this time around, I’m going to push the issue, even if it makes you think I’m nuts (if you are just figuring this out, you may be new to the blog ;-) ). Because the truth is that 2 weeks is nowhere near enough – 3 months really should be the minimum.

And if you haven’t got a garden yet, start thinking about it. What can you easily grow yourself, that would disappear from shops during a crisis (or simply ro protect yourself from the increased fuel and food prices). Vegetables go off quickly, and the distribution of fresh food relies on regular deliveries, that could be disrupted by many things. We’ve been pushing harder than Sharon, for people to think of never-ending crisis (the days of making the rest of the world to act as our veg garden, and big companies stealing – buying, but do they give any choice? – land from poor people, is coming to an end. We think that would be great, and the world as a whole will be better off, but you are going to find it hard if you dont start thinking about your own necessities.

Finally, the most likely disaster to befall you is this. You lose your job. Your spouse losess their job. You spend your savings on a medical crisis or two. You are stretched trying to keep your house/pay your rent/buy gas to get to work, and you don’t have any money for food. Your kids are hungry, and the food pantry is, as at least one US pantry was, down to stale Doritos because of the huge demand. Maybe you get food stamps (assuming the program can still be funded after a radical drop in tax revenue), but they don’t stretch to the end of the month. And two weeks worth of food won’t save you. Neither will three months, but it gives you options.

I know that some of you can’t buy extra food because you can’t buy enough food. For the rest, you need to do what you can, both to protect yourself, and to make sure that you don’t compete for food resources with those who have no ability to protect themselves, maybe ensure that you can drop a few cans at the food pantry, even when things get tough at home. That means a minimum of three months of food. Build it up gradually, write down what you eat, focus on meals based on staple foods like grains, dried beans, locally produced and home preserved vegetables. I wrote during my last class about what a 3 month supply of food looks like.

Good advice. Industrial food makes us ill. Overworked stressful lives makes us really on fast food. The slow down, and return to proper lives, and proper food, grown locally and fresh, should make us much healthier too.

I know this is hard – in March I was being soft, and helping people with baby steps. I’m going to be blunt now – I don’t think we have that much time before it gets harder and harder for more and more of us to prepare and get ahead. I don’t think it will be that long before many of us can’t afford those extra bags of rice anymore. So I’m not going to suggest baby steps anymore – I think all of us should get very, very serious about this. And I wish I didn’t think that.

Those of us that survive the transition, and the attempts by government and the wealthy to hold onto their power, will hopefully find that life is actually much more pleasant. Get to know your neighbours and start planning your transition activities together. Many people don’t even understand the facts of climate change and peak oil. Its up to us that do to take the initiative, and start making plans and actions to prepare, as Sharon says, get very very serious about this. The time that we are able to acquire things from this dying empire is running out, fast.

Share

Milton Freidman and the ninth circle….

Jayson R Jones on Cyrano’s Journal:

We have allowed nearly everything to be privatized: water, power, transportation, energy. There is very little of any value left in public hands, and what is left is already tied up in long term leases that are very beneficial to the private parties holding those leases. The power elite has stripped most industry and manufacturing from this country and out-sourced them overseas. They have sold off much of what remains to foreign investors. The sacking of America is nearly complete and all we common citizens get for it is the debts.

If there is any justice in this world, Freidman is writhing in torment in Dante’s 9th Circle right now….and I fervently hope he remains there for eternity. He is in good company.

So, we are left with the aftermath, and everyone seems to have an idea that will bring us out of the hole we are in. Many look back at the FDR solution, but fail to recognize that what FDR actually did was give Corporate America time to rebuild. His was the third administration to try controlling Capitalism in the short history of the United States, and ultimately he failed to permanently chain the dragon. Reagan turned it loose again and we are now being ravaged by it.

There is an alternative that few seem to want to contemplate. Let’s do away with the source of food for the dragon. Let’s eliminate our horrid system. I can visualize your expression right now, but before you become apoplectic, consider the following. We have everything we really need to do this right now. We US Americans are able provide for most of our current needs without relying upon capitalism. We have the technology and the resources necessary to accomplish this. All we lack is the vision.

That’s our vision. Dismantle it all, and use the parts to build something that is actually better for the planet, people, our lives, our communities (in reality, lots of little somethings, on local levels, designed locally, to support people locally, to protect our natural heritage locally).

I contend that we can eliminate the life force of Capitalism and finally put an end to the source of many of our woes. I maintain that we can be self sufficient and enjoy a high standard of living by allowing people to be what they want to be. Homo sapiens are not lazy by nature; they are both inquisitive and inventive. They are not greedy by nature; they are altruistic and community minded. Homo sapien would never have survived if they thought as we do today, and we will not survive unless we get back to the basics.

How many of us chose a job where we can make a living as opposed to one we would really enjoy? How many of us would have continued our education if we could have afforded it? How many more doctors, scientists, inventors, dreamers, writers, or actors would we have if making a living were not the Prime Directive? How many of us feel stuck in a job we hate, but feel trapped by the necessity of making money to survive? How many choose the military because it offers a way out of their present circumstances, and how many did not choose the military because they could make more in private industry?

And how many of us are forced to ignore our true skills – artists, musicians, communicators, philosophers, gardeners, to name a few – because this system forces us to use our time to make money to pay governments and big business ?

Why are our children graduating from college with burdensome debt that often precludes them from continuing their education? Why do we place financial roadblocks in front of those who could excel but can not afford to be educated? We have been better than this and we can, once again, be better than this. Instead of half measures, and temporary fixes, let’s step outside the box and look at our options. We have the knowledge and technology to take the giant step forward, so why don’t we? The answer is that we have been programmed to blindly accept the status quo. We have been ‘programmed’ to be the servants of Capitalism and a Calvinistic, money-worshipping perversion of Christianity. We have essentially limited ourselves to the use of those tools in the kit that are acceptable to the Capitalist system.

I agree that little will be done to make any substantive changes unless and until we have another revolution. Let us consider making a real change with this revolution. We don’t need another bourgeois revolution like that of the Founders. We need to annihilate Capitalism once and for all.

Climate change and peak oil could be the motivating force behind this ‘revolution’. Although we can make changes in our own lives, these are dwarfed in relation to the damage that our civilisation’s organisational structures are doing to the planet.

ps. There is a comment on the original article about Venzuela. In comparison to most countries, the government of Venezuela has enacted some inspiring policies in recent years, refusing to be allow US corporate domination of the country. Like Cuba, Venezuela seems to have better policies regarding the poor, the environment, and generally sounds like a decent place to live (contrary to the impression given by ‘our’ mainstream, corporate-controlled media). http://www.venezuelanalysis.com

Share

abundant skies: 8 principles for successful rainwater harvesting

8 principles, by Brad Lancaster on Oil Drum: Local.

Principle #1: Begin with long and thoughtful observation.
Principle #2: Start harvesting rain at the top of your watershed, then work your way down.
Principle #3: Always plan an overflow route, and manage overflow as a resource.
Principle #4. Start with small and simple strategies that harvest the rain as close as possible to where it falls.
Principle #5. Spread, slow and infiltrate the flow of water into the soil.
Principle #6. Maximize living and organic groundcover.
Principle #7. Maximize beneficial relationships and efficiency by “stacking functions.”
Principle #8. Continually reassess your system and improve it.

My advice to anyone who wants to get started living more sustainably is to start with rainwater-harvesting. Start at the top. Start small. But above all—start!

Brad’s website, with useful books for sale is www.harvestingrainwater.com/.

Share

what’s your consumption factor?

An interesting question in the International Herald Tribune.

To economists, 32 is even more special, because it measures the difference in lifestyles between the first world and the developing world. The average rates at which people consume resources like oil and metals, and produce wastes like plastics and greenhouse gases, are about 32 times higher in North America, Western Europe, Japan and Australia than they are in the developing world. That factor of 32 has big consequences.

To understand them, consider our concern with world population.

Today, there are more than 6.5 billion people, and that number may grow to around 9 billion within this half-century. Several decades ago, many people considered rising population to be the main challenge facing humanity. Now we realize that it matters only insofar as people consume and produce.
If most of the world’s 6.5 billion people were in cold storage and not metabolizing or consuming, they would create no resource problem.

What really matters is total world consumption, the sum of all local consumptions, which is the product of local population times the local per capita consumption rate.

The estimated 1 billion people who live in developed countries have a relative per capita consumption rate of 32. Most of the world’s other 5.5 billion people constitute the developing world, with relative per-capita consumption rates below 32, mostly down toward 1.

Just think about it, 5.5 billion people consuming 32 times less than most people in developed countries, but being fed the lie that they too can aspire to squander and waste the earth’s resources.

People in the third world are aware of this difference in per capita consumption, although most of them couldn’t specify that it’s by a factor of 32. When they believe their chances of catching up to be hopeless, they sometimes get frustrated and angry, and some become terrorists, or tolerate or support terrorists. Since Sept. 11, 2001, it has become clear that the oceans that once protected the United States no longer do so. There will be more terrorist attacks against us and Europe, and perhaps against Japan and Australia, as long as that factorial difference of 32 in consumption rates persists.

And the other side of this is that the ‘developed’ countries maintain their privilege through tactics that could also be called terrorism. Since when has US foreign policy been trying to make the world a nicer or more equitable place? How many US bases in how many foreign countries? How many dictators supported so that US companies can stripmine thats countries resources? And its not just the US. The whole system is set up to keep a few incredibly wealthy, while food, minerals, oil etc are funneled away from the world’s poor, lining the pockets of the world’s rich.

Americans may think of China’s growing consumption as a problem. But the Chinese are only reaching for the consumption rate Americans already have. To tell them not to try would be futile.

The only approach that China and other developing countries will accept is to aim to make consumption rates and living standards more equal around the world. But the world doesn’t have enough resources to allow for raising China’s consumption rates, let alone those of the rest of the world, to our levels. Does this mean we’re headed for disaster?

No, we could have a stable outcome in which all countries converge on consumption rates considerably below the current highest levels.

Americans might object: There is no way we would sacrifice our living standards for the benefit of people in the rest of the world.

Nevertheless, whether we get there willingly or not, we shall soon have lower consumption rates, because our present rates are unsustainable.

And so we should, also because it is unfair. But thats not to say that ‘quality of life ‘ need decline. A local, low impact, more natural lifestyle may mean less ‘stuff’ to buy, throw away, buy again, but it needn’t mean impoverished lives (such as capitalism and empire have forced onto others around the world).

Real sacrifice wouldn’t be required, however, because living standards are not tightly coupled to consumption rates. Much American consumption is wasteful and contributes little or nothing to quality of life. For example, per capita oil consumption in Western Europe is about half of ours, yet Western Europe’s standard of living is higher by any reasonable criterion, including life expectancy, health, infant mortality, access to medical care, financial security after retirement, vacation time, quality of public schools and support for the arts. Ask yourself whether Americans’ wasteful use of gasoline contributes positively to any of those measures.

Other aspects of our consumption are wasteful, too. Most of the world’s fisheries are still operated non-sustainably, and many have already collapsed or fallen to low yields – even though we know how to manage them in such a way as to preserve the environment and the fish supply. If we were to operate all fisheries sustainably, we could extract fish from the oceans at maximum historical rates and carry on indefinitely.

The same is true of forests: We already know how to log them sustainably, and if we did so worldwide, we could extract enough timber to meet the world’s wood and paper needs. Yet most forests are managed non-sustainably, with decreasing yields.

Just as it is certain that within most of our lifetimes we’ll be consuming less than we do now, it is also certain that per capita consumption rates in many developing countries will one day be more nearly equal to ours. These are desirable trends, not horrible prospects. In fact, we already know how to encourage the trends; the main thing lacking has been political will.

It’s time to grow up, stop stealing sweets from our class mates, stop the bullies in the playground, and start taking responsibility for our needs, our impacts, and recognise that we all have a right to a decent life, an equal right. Stop our governments terrorising the world and start really talking about how we can make a fair and just world society, based on healthy local realities.

Share

is a big hunk of steak worth almost 2,000 gallons of water?

asks Colin Dunn on Alternet.

Summer is heating up, and all the pools, barbeques, lawn-watering and the like that put our water use under the microscope, even more than it is the rest of the year. But did you know that we all have a “water-footprint”?

Quite similar in concept to the carbon footprint, our water footprints are defined as “the total volume of freshwater that is used to produce the goods and services consumed by the individual, business or nation,” by Waterfootprint.org. People use lots of water for drinking, cooking and washing, but even more for producing things such as food, paper, cotton clothes, etc. The numbers are staggering.

In the US, our water footprint is 2,500 cubic meters per capita, which translates roughly to 660,430 U.S. gallons per person per year. Compare that to 700 cubic meters per year per capita (184,920 gallons) in China and 1150 cubic meters per year per capita (303,798 gallons) in Japan. That’s a lot of water down the drain at our hands.

This is apropos to Graham’s discussion earlier about knowing what it takes to “make” meat, and learning where it comes from; when you consider that it takes about 1,916 gallons of water to produce one pound of beef, it helps contextualize the impact of your meat-eating choices.

Sure, we can all use less, buy less and consume less, which is easy to say and hard to do, but breaking it down and considering these numbers makes one simple food choice — to eat less meat — have much more gravity. I’m not in to guilt-tripping anyone into a greener lifestyle, but I encourage you to ask yourself this: Is having a big hunk of steak really worth almost 2,000 gallons of water?

Reducing our water consumption isn’t just about sharing a bath, or putting a brick in the toilet cistern. Some more interesting facts from waterfootprint.com:

  1. The production of one kilogram of beef requires 16 thousand litres of water.
  2. To produce one cup of coffee we need 140 litres of water.
  3. The water footprint of China is about 700 cubic meter per year per capita. Only about 7% of the Chinese water footprint falls outside China.
  4. Japan with a footprint of 1150 cubic meter per year per capita, has about 65% of its total water footprint outside the borders of the country.
  5. The USA water footprint is 2500 cubic meter per year per capita.

You can roughly work out your water footprint here. Or find out what your country’s average is here, and compare yours with your country’s. Global average is 1243 m3 per capita, and surprisingly the database tells us that UK average is roughly global average, but with 70% coming from outside of the UK, while the USA average is almost twice the global (but only 19% comes from outside the US borders).

The product gallery is interesting, but unfortunately does not take into account different methods of raising food crops and animals. Small scale organic raised beds presumably need less water than huge monocultures in bare soil, for instance. And locally produced foods require less infrastructure and transportation, that itself uses water.

Share

sustainable food – lecture videos

Videos from the Urban Homesteaders.
Part One:

Part Two:

Part Three:

Part Four:

Share

doing more with less

Inspiration from the urban homesteaders.

With headlines about rising food costs, soaring gas prices, and skyrocketing foreclosure rates that reach directly into everyone’s wallets, as well as sobering reports about the state of the earth’s environment, there is mounting pressure for some relief. The question arises: How can an individual or one family cope in such trying times?

When I was confronted with the anxieties of living in the turbulent years of the late 1960s and early 1970s, I started searching for a way out by looking at alternative answers for how best to provide for my family. My desire was for us to be healthy and strong and to be able to live long and happy lives. I believed the only way to achieve this was to learn how to grow my own food and to live a simple lifestyle. This belief would take me on a lifelong journey. From Louisiana to New Zealand, to Florida, and then to Southern California, it was a long, winding, and difficult road.

In 2000, GMOs were introduced into the food chain by large corporations. Perceiving this to be a crisis threatening the health and survival of my family, I reacted radically. To ensure that my food supply was safe, I took matters into my own hands, trying to grow as much of my own food as possible. This project became my “Path to Freedom.”

In the midst of the urban wilderness of Los Angeles County, in downtown Pasadena, with the help of my adult children, I continued to turn my city lot into an urban homestead, fanatically planting every available space to the four corners of our small world. After much manual labor, my property would be transformed into a wildlife sanctuary, a home to citified barnyard animals, and a petite paradise where over 400 species of flora have been grown.

During the summer, up to 90 percent of my family’s vegetarian diet comes from our garden. Not only do we have the assurance of knowing where our food comes from and the satisfaction of having grown it ourselves, we enjoy produce that is unbeatably healthful and tasty. The days of having others sow, grow, harvest, and deliver to the grocery store our family’s food were gone, at least for a large percentage of our diet.

Later, we would further push for more freedom by tackling our energy usage on a variety of fronts. From simple steps such as installing CFLs, using only energy efficient/Energy Star appliances, and not using a clothes dryer, to more radical steps of forgoing electrical appliances altogether and installing solar panels, we reduced our average daily usage from 10.6 kwh to 6.0 kwh and produce much of that energy through our solar panels.

We addressed the transportation energy problem by owning only one car (a 1988 diesel Suburban) for a family of four adults; cutting back on the number of trips made; and learning how to brew biodiesel in our garage from waste vegetable oil. Our fuel costs about $1.00 per gallon. A future step planned is to cut back further on water usage.

What we have accomplished and the freedom we have gained was by way of manageable stages, along with incremental steps, because there is no quick fix. Path to Freedom has taken the vanguard position in order to incite change and to be an example of the possibilities. Today, more and more green options are widely available for the average person. Because not everyone can employ all these extreme measures at once, the question narrows down to: What can you do, where you are, with what you have, right now?

We must start by building on foundational principles in order to construct a bright future out of bleak conditions. A prerequisite principle is that of sacrifice. We must be prepared to sacrifice to achieve results and, also, to stay the course over the long haul, because no dream of any worth can be realized cheaply.

Given the bad news coming from both scientists and economists, a new direction is required, that of living lightly on the earth. We must be willing to cut back—cut back on the amount and type of travel we do; lower the amount of energy we use to heat or cool our houses; and reduce the number of single-use items we buy. Practice thrift: use it up, wear it out, or make it do. In the end, we might just have to do without. By making small sacrifices now, we will be much better prepared to face any difficult circumstances later.

Another principle, worth bringing back from bygone eras, is that of self-reliance or “do-it-yourself.” One of the reasons I started growing my own food was that I wanted the benefits of eating organic vegetables and fruit, but I couldn’t afford to buy them in the grocery store. People searching for true stability can find it in the empowerment and fulfillment that comes from learning the basic skills of providing for oneself. The future depends on our developing the old-fashioned virtue of independence and exercising faith in the power of the “common man.”

These principles, in order to be implemented, must be backed by passion—the passion of truly, deeply caring for our families and for our home, earth. Because, let’s face it. Our world is in deep, deep trouble and we are the “troublemakers.” We have to make real, difficult changes yesterday. Despite the obvious benefits, we are not going to recycle, compost, or talk our way out of this. Our leaders, being politicians, are not leaders at all but are bound to be followers, who just won’t be there for us in a crisis. So, it’s up to me and you to make the choice of becoming responsible stewards of the earth.

Let’s turn the world right side up. Join us on our journey towards a sustainable present and future. Let’s walk the path to freedom!

Share