Dismantle Civilisation Rotating Header Image

act local

Food Rebellions: 7 Steps to Solving the Food Crisis

Resistance to the trade and “aid” policies that displace farmers and increase hunger.

by Eric Holt-Gimenez, at YES! magazine (Spring 2009: Food for Everyone Issue).

The World Food Program describes the current global food crisis as a silent tsunami, with billions of people going hungry. Hunger is, indeed, coming in waves, but not everyone will drown in famine. The recurrent food crises are making a handful of corporations very rich—even as they put the rest of the planet at risk.

Built over half a century, largely with public grain subsidies and foreign aid, the global food-industrial complex is made up of large corporations that sell grain, seed, chemicals, and fertilizer, along with global supermarket chains and food processors.

When these players first came on the scene, world agriculture was different. Forty years ago, the global South had yearly agricultural trade surpluses of $1 billion. After three “Development Decades,” they were importing $11 billion a year in food. Immediately following de-colonization in the 1960s, Africa exported $1.3 billion in food a year. Today it imports 25 percent of its food.

International trade agreements and pressure from the global North opened up entire continents to cheap, subsidized grain from the North. This put local farmers out of business, devastated local crop diversity, and consolidated control of the world’s food system in the hands of multinational corporations. Today three companies, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), Cargill, and Bunge control 90 percent of the world’s grain trade.

The official prescriptions for solving the world food crisis call for more subsidies for industrialized nations, more food aid, and more so-called Green (or Gene) Revolutions. Expecting the institutions that built the current flawed food system to solve the food crisis is like asking an arsonist to put out a forest fire. When the world food crisis exploded in early 2008, ADM’s profits increased by 38 percent, Cargill’s by 128 percent, and Mosaic Fertilizer (a Cargill subsidiary) by a whopping 1,615 percent!

For decades, family farmers the world over have resisted this corporate control. They have worked to diversify crops, protect soil and native seeds, and conserve nature. They have established local gardens, businesses, and community-based food systems. These strategies are effective. They need to be given a chance to work.

The solutions to the food crisis are those that make the lives of family farmers easier: re-regulate the market, reduce the power of the agri-foods industrial complex, and build ecologically resilient family agriculture. Here are some of the needed steps:

  1. Support domestic food production.
  2. Stabilize and guarantee fair prices to farmers and consumers by re-establishing floor prices and publicly owned national grain reserves. Establish living wages for workers on farms, in processing facilities, and in supermarkets.
  3. Halt agrofuels expansion.
  4. Curb speculation in food.
  5. Promote a return to smallholder farming. On a pound-per-acre basis, family farms are more productive than large-scale industrial farms. And they use less oil. Because 75 percent of the world’s poor are farmers, this will address poverty, too.
  6. Support agro-ecological production.
  7. Food sovereignty: Recognize the right of all people to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound methods and their own food systems.

The political will to take these steps must come from informed social movements. These movements already exist, and are gaining strength in the face of the food crisis. Together we can fix the food system and solve the food crisis once and for all.

Eric Holt-Gimenez wrote this article as part of Food for Everyone, the Spring 2009 issue of YES! Magazine. Eric is executive director of Food First. This article was adapted from “The World Food Crisis.” Find the full-length version at www.foodfirst.org.

Share

Money! – a talk by Charles Eisenstein

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Share

Grow your own Food – One Million Gardens

Share

PCI new manifesto and appeal

Post Carbon Institute Manifesto: The Time For Change Has Come

Also published at Richard Heinberg’s Museletter, is a new manifesto for the Post Carbon Institute, that ends with an appeal for us all to get busy(er), local and viral.

Introduction

The United States is in the beginning stages of an historic economic collapse. As of early 2009, five million Americans have already been pushed into the unemployment line, while an average of more than 600,000 join them each month. The Federal government has thrown more than a trillion dollars at the financial crisis, but the symptoms only worsen.

Meanwhile, an even more profound crisis has been silently gathering for decades and is now reaching a point of no return. This crisis manifests as the twin challenges of global fossil fuel depletion and environmental collapse.

The world almost certainly experienced peak oil production last summer, and peaks in natural gas and coal production are not far off1. But renewable energy sources are nowhere near ready to substitute in the quantities and applications we currently require. The best known, and potentially most severe, of environmental challenges is global climate change. Yet we are also now facing a series of natural resource limits—fresh water supplies, fish stocks, topsoil, and biodiversity—that threaten our very existence.

Our 21st century dependence on 20th century hydrocarbon energy (fossil fuels) is the root of all the economic and environmental threats we face. Individually, each of these challenges would test us. Their combined force will reshape our planet and society in unimaginable ways.

All of the debts for society’s century-long industrial fiesta are coming due at the same time. We have no choice but to transition to a world no longer dependent on fossil fuels, a world made up of communities and economies that function within ecological bounds. Thus the most important question of our time: How do we manage the transition to a post-carbon world?

Post Carbon Institute is dedicated to helping individuals, families, businesses, communities, and governments understand and manage the transition to a post-carbon world. Our aim is to bring together the best thinking and models in such a way that the challenges we face can be easily understood, and the best solutions can be identified and replicated as quickly, sustainably, and equitably as possible.

These are unprecedented times that will test our courage, resourcefulness, and commitment. Many communities have already begun their post-carbon journey. We hope you join us.

The Limits

In 1972, the Limits to Growth report2 explored the consequences of exponential growth in population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion for Earth’s ecosystems. The book came under immediate fire and has remained controversial ever since, but its underlying premise is irrefutable: At some point in time, humanity’s ever-increasing resource consumption will meet the very real limits of a planet with finite natural resources. We believe that time has now come.

An explosion in population and consumption—fed by cheap, abundant energy—has brought previously unimaginable advances in health, wealth, transport, and communications. But this growth has come at an equally unimaginable cost. The world is at, nearing, or past a number of critical limits:

  • Global oil, natural gas, and coal production
  • Climate stability
  • Fresh water and fish stocks
  • Food production
  • Biodiversity and habitats

Some of these limits are now well understood; some remain controversial or unknown to the general populace. The full scope of the damage to the biosphere and the depletion of natural resources would take volumes to describe in detail, 3 but the general picture is inescapable: we face looming scarcity.

It is no coincidence that so many resource peaks are occurring together. All are causally related by way of the historic reality that, for the past 200 years, cheap and abundant energy from fossil fuels has driven technological invention, increases in total and per-capita resource extraction and consumption (including food production), and population growth. We are enmeshed in a classic self-reinforcing feedback loop.

fossil fuel cycle

Our starting point for future planning, then, must be the realization that we are living today at the end of the period of greatest material abundance in human history—an abundance based on temporary sources of cheap energy that made all else possible. Now that the most important of those sources are entering their inevitable sunset phase, we are at the beginning of a period of overall economic contraction.

Challenge & Opportunity

2008 was a year for the history books. Global oil production likely peaked over the summer4 and began its inevitable and terminal decline, leading to great uncertainty and shocks to everything from transportation and manufacturing to food production and healthcare. Climate scientists and activists, impelled by increasing evidence that global warming is happening faster and more severely than even the most dire of prior scenarios had predicted, united behind the call to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 350 parts per million (we are now at 387ppm and rising).

Also in 2008, a new U.S. President was elected with the promise of “change. ” And of course, the global economy began its plunge towards a new Depression, triggered by the US mortgage crisis, the historic spike in oil prices, and the collapse of the automobile and financial industries.

Together, these events signal that the time for real change is upon us.

The Post-Carbon Transition

Seeing an opportunity to simultaneously address the economic and climate crises, the federal government recently authorized $500 million for “green collar” job training5, with the goal of creating new jobs to retrofit buildings and deploy solar and wind energy technologies. While this is a laudable start, the circumstances demand much more.

The post-carbon transition must not be limited to building wind turbines and solar panels, or weatherizing homes. Alternative energy sources and greater efficiencies are important, but will not suffice for two key reasons:

  • There are no alternative energy sources (renewable or otherwise) capable of supplying energy as cheaply and in such abundance as fossil fuels currently yield, in the brief time that we need them to come online
  • We have designed and built the infrastructure of our transport, electricity, and food systems—as well as our building stock—to suit the unique characteristics of oil, natural gas, and coal. Changing to different energy sources will require the redesign of many aspects of these systems.

The post-carbon transition must entail the thorough redesign of our societal infrastructure, which today is utterly dependent on cheap fossil fuels. Just as the fossil fuel economy of today systemically and comprehensively differs from the agrarian economy of 1800, the post-fossil fuel economy of 2050 will profoundly differ from all that we are familiar with now. This difference will be reflected in urban design, land use patterns, food systems, manufacturing output, distribution networks, the job market, transportation systems, health care, tourism, and more. It will also require a fundamental rethinking of our economic and cultural values.

The New Economy

Quite simply, our growth-based economy has failed us and is failing the planet. It is time to embrace a new economic framework, one that sees the economy as a subset of our global ecosystem, not the other way around. Herman Daly and Josh Farley, in Ecological Economics, contrast the two systems clearly:

“We define growth as an increase in throughput, which is the flow of natural resources from the environment, through the economy, and back to the environment as waste. It is a quantitative increase in the physical dimensions of the economy and/or of the waste stream produced by the economy. This kind of growth, of course, cannot continue indefinitely, as the Earth and its resources are not infinite…

“Where conventional economics espouses growth forever, ecological economics envisions a steady-state economy at optimal scale. Each is logical within its own pre-analytic vision, and each is absurd from the viewpoint of the other. The difference could not be more basic, more elementary, or more irreconcilable.”

Recent global events have made it plainly clear which of the two economic frameworks is truly absurd.

Leading the Transition

The winds of social change are upon us. Consumerism as we’ve known it is at death’s door—not because everyone has joined the Sierra Club, but because suddenly nobody can afford to buy much of anything. Our new historical moment requires different thinking and strategies, but it also opens new opportunities to solve some very practical problems. Ideas from the environmentalist community that for decades have been derided by economists and politicians—reducing consumption, re-localizing economic activity, building self-sufficiency—are suddenly being taken seriously, and people want to know more about them.

Quietly, a small but growing movement of engaged citizens, community groups, businesses, and elected officials has begun the transition to a post-carbon world. These early actors have worked to reduce consumption, produce local food and energy, invest in local economies, rebuild skills, and preserve local ecosystems. For some citizens, this effort has merely entailed planting a garden, riding a bike to work, or no longer buying from “big-box” stores. Their motivations are diverse, including halting climate change, environmental preservation, food security, and local economic development. The essence of these efforts, however, is the same: they all recognize that the world is changing, and the old way of doing things, based on the idea that consumption can and should continue to grow indefinitely, no longer works.

Alone, these efforts are not nearly enough. But taken together, they can point the way towards a new economy. This new economy would not be a “free market” but a “real market,” much like the one famed economist Adam Smith originally envisioned; it would be, as author David Korten has said, an economy driven by Main Street and not Wall Street.7

Thus far, most of these efforts have been made voluntarily by exceptional individuals who were quick to understand the crisis we face. But as the collapse unfolds, more and more people will be searching for ways to meet even basic needs. Families reliant on supermarkets with globe-spanning supply chains will need to turn more to local farmers and their own gardens. Many corporations—unable to provide a continuous return on investment or to rely on cheap energy and natural resources to turn a profit—will fail, while local businesses and cooperatives of all kinds will flourish. Local governments facing declining tax revenues will be desperate to find cheap, low-energy ways to support basic public services like water treatment, public transportation, and emergency services.

What we need now are clarity, leadership, coordination, and collaboration. With shared purpose and a clear understanding of both the challenges and the solutions, we can manage the transition to a sustainable, equitable, post-carbon world.

Elements of a transition strategy have been proposed for decades, with few notable results. Usually these have been presented as independent—sometimes even contradictory—solutions to the problems created by fossil fuel dependency and consumerism. Now that business-as-usual is ceasing to be an option for mainstream society, these strategies need to be re-thought and re-articulated coherently, and to become the mainstream. But this will require coordinated effort on the part of those who understand both the problems and the solutions.


The Role of Post Carbon Institute

Post Carbon Institute is dedicated to answering the central question of our times: How do we manage the transition to a post-growth, post-fossil fuel, climate-changed world?

It will be Post Carbon Institute’s role to publicly discuss these issues in accessible ways, and as aspects of a systemic, interdependent web of crises. We will gather and analyze response strategies (whether proven or under experimentation), and disseminate them to the individuals, communities, businesses, and governments who need them. We will develop the framing and messaging of these issues so as to significantly raise the visibility and impact of emerging solutions.

We will constantly monitor both challenges and exciting new developments in a range of fields: energy, climate, food systems, land use, green building construction and retrofits, biodiversity and ecological restoration, water, transportation, and new economic systems. We will highlight green-leader cities and businesses, Transition Town 8 initiatives and ecovillage developments, local energy cooperatives, and innovative NGOs.

Through our close relationships with forward-thinking communities and organizations, Post Carbon Institute is uniquely positioned to both draw from their best practices and provide them with the resources they need to quickly scale up and replicate their work. To our knowledge, there is no other organization taking this important leadership role.

The centerpiece of our effort is the development of a select community of Post Carbon Fellows—leading or emerging experts in the most important issues concerning the transition. Post Carbon Fellows will regularly write and speak about both their specific area of expertise and the transition as a whole. Together, Fellows will publish an annual Roadmap For the Transition, covering each of the principal issue areas—and the latest efforts to address the crisis—in a unified, holistic way.

How is this different from what is already happening? Most if not all of the relevant information we are concerned with already exists, much of it on the Internet. There are magazines devoted to various aspects of the “alternatives” movement, and there are organizations doing good work in these areas. But what’s lacking is a unified vision of both the challenges and solutions that sees all of these fields as interrelated.

This unified vision can be communicated through the work of a think tank composed of thought leaders from key fields who can identify, contextualize, and bring to light the most exciting developments within their areas of expertise, while highlighting the relationships between these fields. No other organization is so well positioned to reach, learn from, and support transition efforts in such a broad array of fields. No other organization has the reputation and background to be able to connect grassroots organizers, policymakers, and the media on these issues.

Appeal

As bad news continues to pour in from climate scientists, petroleum geologists, and economists, there is a growing realization that the decisions we make in the next few years will determine what the world will be like for generations—perhaps millennia—to come. This historic moment of transition is a precious and brief opportunity; we all have some sense of what is at stake and what could happen if society continues down its current path.

But if we are successful in our efforts, the movement to nurture a sustainable post-carbon world will go both viral and local. It will become the mainstream, and the kinds of efforts we are championing will be so commonplace that further work on our part will be unnecessary. In the meantime, we have one chance—and it may be humanity’s very last chance—to turn away from the precipice. We have an enormous challenge, and extraordinary opportunity. Please join us.

Share

shake up and direct the collapse

Another great article from Jan Lundberg, at CultureChange.

Personal cars must be outlawed. Auto manufacturing jobs are disappearing in the U.S. anyway, so why allow imported cars to drain our wallets and worsen the balance of trade? This rudderless nation needs to veer toward sense and wake up from the manufactured “American Dream,” and find healing for both nature and personal health.

The benefits from outlawing personal cars or bringing about their earliest demise will stimulate a great deal of economic activity of the sustainable kind. The sectors to benefit would be in all forms of alternative transportation that offer sustainability: low-tech, inexpensive, and using local resources. The work created would be local as people give up the jobs down the highway (these jobs are disappearing anyway) that are far away from one’s neighborhood.

Three quarters of U.S. commuters go by car, in a single-occupant vehicle. If these planet-killing citizens would give that up voluntarily, they would be liberating themselves in several positive ways, and we would all be better off ecologically. But since doing the wrong thing is rewarded as a feature of the dominant culture, an extreme response to change habits is required.

Oil and car infrastructure doomed

As motorists are presently opting to fix rather than buy cars in order to save money, the trend is that of ending up with a jalopy fleet. But what would the cars run on? In a collapsing economy the oil industry will not be refining and shipping unlimited supplies of petroleum products as before. Meeting demand sounds simple and the pace of depletion of crude reserves seems surmountable, but the industry isn’t able to ratchet down and provide all products to all sectors according to many peak oilists’ energy-descent assumptions. This I learned as an oil-industry analyst serving major oil companies and government for 13 years.

Additionally, as we know from Matt Simmons, oil industry investment banker and author, the petroleum infrastructure is rapidly rusting into a state of eventual and enforced disuse. So the car as mass transportation will be history, despite technofix-dreams of switching the means of propulsion.

Who might conceivably pull off such a ban of personal cars? It’s hard to imagine it now, but we can imagine the ban on smoking in public buildings being almost accomplished across the U.S. — seemingly unlikely a couple of decades ago. As cars increasingly appear to be the financial and environmental drain that they are, and the economic picture only worsens, more radical steps at restructuring will come to the fore. It could be that national pride pushes major transformation, as U.S. car companies completely collapse and leave the field to imports. Many may ask, why let that happen?

The pleasant surprise of working more locally is that it will be more for oneself and one’s community. Local people know each other and cannot ignore each other’s problems and needs if they are front and present. Cars are isolating socially, and serve competition between neighbors that only benefits corporations that keep people in hock with unnecessary purchases.

How to heal while getting ahead financially

Car-free living is a start. If I hadn’t sold my car, my last one, in 1989, my health would be much the poorer. After a number of months after ditching my Buick Behemoth, I was surprised to notice in the mirror that I had developed my leg muscles markedly. And the money I saved on gasoline, insurance, repairs, registration, etc., was as satisfying as learning that I had not slowed down my mobility whatsoever: Ivan Illich calculated in his book Energy and Equity that the average speed of the U.S. motorist, when taking into account most of the hours associated with car ownership — compared to miles traveled — is adjusted to just 5 MPH (five miles per hour).

Personal transformation is needed to cope with the unfolding global crisis. To come out better for the experience, we must address our health and our personal responsibility in a way that adds to our own power and capability to improve ourselves. In so doing, we improve the lot of our families and communities. It comes down to healing. The question is how.

Taking care of one’s health became relegated in the U.S. to primarily visiting doctors, hospitals and taking medications. None of these practices had to do with healing by the individual in a natural fashion. Sensing this, and in an effort to become healthier and regain our self control, the health food movement, self-help and alternative healing methods became more popular. Chiropractic and massage, for example, have started to make inroads for mainstream and corporate respectability.

But those 1960s and ’70s-era developments did not do enough. Health care in the capitalistic, insurance dominated, drugged-out U.S. must be addressed in a radical way, if only for cost control and affordability.

To detoxify the body and reduce stress is to heal and avoid major health crises and the costs they claim. Fasting is always effective, contrary to fears held by the uninitiated. One benefit is not having to buy food during the fast, and when eating resumes, costly processed foods or restaurant fare is not only ill-advised but repugnant.

The top fasting author, the late Herbert M. Shelton, wrote in Natural Hygiene: Man’s Pristine Way of Life
We are not Reformers; we are Revolutionists. Medical reform — the world has had quite enough of that. Reforming the drug system by substituting one set of drugs for another is a ridiculous farce. It may, to be sure, substitute a lesser for a greater evil, in many cases, but is like reforming big lies with little falsehoods.

The health benefits of not driving are tremendous, whether you spare yourself a fatal crash or killing others, or you’re just escaping the sedentary lifestyle whereby you breath plastics and other petrochemical poisons. During a fast, one’s meditative perception makes clear how much of a strain driving is on our health and spirit. If it should be avoided during a fast, that should call driving into question as normal or harmless.

The Depression and health

One of the hardships of this Depression is that medical costs are keeping constant during income loss and disappearing credit. “Health care is weighing down income,” reported the Associate Press in an article syndicated starting March 9, 2009, titled “Recession on track to be longest in postwar period” and sometimes as “Recession closes in on postwar record”.

Our mental health as a people and individually is pushed to the breaking point as stress mounts and “the way home” is obscured by fear and vested interests. Fasting and liberating oneself from the onerous car improves our frame of mind and reduces the discouraging tendencies of watching material security evaporate at the hands of the big corporations. Those profiting off greed and destruction are happy to see people remain discouraged and disempowered. All this can change rapidly, as we are seeing.

When those who care about the Earth and seek fundamental change see this newspaper headline for February’s Depression statistics — “Industrial Output Declines for a 4th Month” — it would prompt an eco-jihadist to shout, “God is great!”(or rather, “Goddesses are great!”) Rather than being extremist, this exuberant stance actually embraces the inevitable and welcomes an historic departure for wayward modern humanity. Lest anyone be thought of as insensitive or elitist for advocating revolutionary change — defined as changing consciousness rather than replacing rulers — there is no employment on a dead planet.

The Associated Press reported on March 16th, “Industrial output dropped 1.4 percent last month and the factory operating rate dropped to the lowest level in more than a half-century of record keeping, the government said.” Indeed! Highly entropic activity is calming down — healing to our bodies, spirits, and nature.

Another recent post by Jan tells us that for the first time since world war 2, the number of new cars on the roads is forecast to be less than the number of cars junked, in the year leading up to june 30th. Fantastic.

“Cars were a bubble” – General Motors

Share

the story of MyFarm

Share

but what can I do?

The most lethal of attitudes, which a friend recently stated when we were talking about peak oil, climate change and economic or environmental collapse. It is shocking that people who think of themselves as educated and informed can feel so disempowered, or use powerlessness as a shield to justify not attempting to change anything. I wonder how many people would prefer a different world, but constantly chant the mantra of ‘I can’t change it all on my own, so why bother trying to change anything’, instead of actually making changes in their own lives and starting to join with others to make bigger changes.

You do not have to shop at supermarkets, and in fact in most cases you do not have to shop. We can make a difference and in fact, it is the actions of individuals, people who just do what they feel is right without looking to see if anyone else is following, that have made all the positive changes in history.

The credit crisis is permeating its way through the economies of the world. Farmers who normally borrow money for seed and fertilisers, retailers who borrow money to stock their shelves, lorry drivers who borrow to fill their tanks – all are finding it hard to get that credit, and all are part of the chain that brings food to the consumers. We may well see famine in the west next year, due to the finance crisis, and yet most people do not see this catastrophe coming, while many that are aware are unable or unwilling to change their lifestyles in any meaningful way, that could ensure food in their homes next year.

The era of consumerism is coming to an end. The worst scenario could be widespread empty shelves overnight, and all the social upheavals that could cause. Although I think this is unlikely, it is very possible in small areas, and the best we can expect is ever increasing prices, pushing many staple foods out of the financial reach of poorer sections of society.

We need to be aware that this is on the horizon, and to start asking ‘what can I do’ in a realistic way, seriously trying to find answers. Even people in apartments could be growing foods in tubs and guerilla gardening, or cooperating with others who do own land, or approaching local authorities to suggest that council land could be used for growing food.

Even if people in authority, or other local landowners aren’t responsive to your ideas, every time these subjects are raised its another time they have been pushed into the spotlight. This is being called a recession now, but we need to keep telling people that this is more than a recession. We need to keep shouting that this is the end of the world as we know it, and in fact climate change dictates that we MUST end the world that we grew up with, as it is killing our planet.

This is not a time to feel powerless. It is a time where we need to think sideways, find local innovative solutions, force friends and neighbours to cooperate, and in cities to start turning every available inch of under-used land to grow organic food.

Some ideas won’t work, while some will, but we dont have time to feel self pity or disempowerment. We all need to become permaculture social activists.

Share

landshare

Hugh Fearnley Wittingstall, author of River Cottage books and TV series in the UK, has come up with a great idea to try to connect people with land they dont use to people who want access to land for growing food etc.

What is Landshare?

With allotment waiting lists massively over-subscribed and people right across the country keener than ever to grow their own fruit and veg, the aim for Landshare is to become a UK wide initiative to make British land more productive and fresh local produce more accessible to all. But all of this depends on people like you registering their interest now.

Sign up to help us build the momentum we need to launch this exciting project in early 2009. In the meantime, via monthly updates, you’ll get the chance to help shape the initiative and make sure you’re amongst the first to have the opportunity to be involved.

A very simple idea, using the internet to put people in touch, Landshare is a little idea that could really help people in the difficult times ahead, in the UK.

Managed by Channel 4 TV, the website is here.

Share

Implementing Real Democracy

As the post ‘The Fallacy of Democracy’ discussed, the current form of government we call ‘democracy’ is deeply flawed to the point where it barely approaches meeting its own meaning – rule by the people. The Empire will always win, as no candidate proposing real change would ever be able to credibly run for any office or would be stopped by the elite. So how can we ever achieve a real democracy with people deciding their own futures, and how can this happen despite the overpowering nature of the current system? To answer this it’s necessary to analyse that current system and how it arose.

To put in the simplest manner possible, our governments only exist in order to stop the poor murdering the rich, the slaves killing their masters. If there was no government or official militia (police or armed forces), the huge number of exploited people would no doubt rise up and revolt and demand equality. To stop this from happening, from the very beginning the masters hired and formed militias with their stolen wealth, with which they kept the slaves orderly with the fear of these militias. This is how governments and nation-states start, as the militia and mediator between masters and slaves.

Eventually, as wealth became ever more concentrated by the rich, the governments make concessions to pacify the poor, such as social reforms, the welfare state, 8 hour days etc. Although seemingly revolutionary, these only serve to capture some of the crumbs from the table of rich to distribute to the poor. After a significant amount of time, the people even demand a say in how the government is run. This was a difficult crisis for the elite to manage, but one that was solved very cleverly – the people could vote for a few centralised ‘parties’, whose existence is only enabled with the permission and approval of the elite. This way it seems we have a democracy, yet in fact have very little say in the way things change. Candidate X may tend towards more concessions for the poor, candidate Y will favour concessions for the elite. The pendulum swings endlessly between the two, always ensuring in the long-term the middle ground where just enough wealth is sacrificed by the elite to pacify the poor but not too much so as to prevent the growth of their own fortunes.

With the odds so stacked against us in the current system, we have to create a new system in which to rewild in. But how do we avoid the mistakes of the past and lay to rest the hierarchical model of government?

It’s all a matter of scale. Beyond a certain number of people in a group (it’s been found to be around 200 people in many studies) it becomes impossible to know everyone in the group personally. As a result, in order for some sort of order to develop in decision making some sort of hierarchy forms to unify that large group. Unless this occurs on the basis of smaller sub-groups and delegation, this is the first step down a slippery road to domination and slavery based system of organising ourselves. An egalitarian society based on the unified group model will inevitably succumb to authoritarianism – every republic, however noble its first principles, will slip towards fascism as time passes.

The alternative is the tribe model, the model which has lasted for hundreds and thousands of years for many societies even today. In a tribe setting, each group will be below 200 people and so will contain very little hierarchy. A representative/facilitator character exists to co-ordinate the group in coming to communal decisions, and also in some areas acts as a delegate to a larger confederacy. In this ‘federation’ each group maintains its identity but could co-operate with neighbouring groups without being unified with them. This again serves to avoid hierarchy as much as possible. There is no core armed group acting as an enforcing militia – the entire group enforces decisions reached amongst itself. And most importantly there is equality, no persons become rich at the expense of others. This is the core principle to the continued existence of this system, and is why many tribes collapse when they come in contact with civilisation, as this foundation stone is infected and destroyed by our ego-based way of thinking.

How can we retribalise now though? It seems impossible to return to this way of living so far down the road of civilisation, and questions of population density and co-ordination of all these groups arise. Although forming a tribe seems like a difficult proposition, the same concept is at work when many people speak of recreating communities and community based living. However one might want to term it, small groups concerned with the local area they occupy are at the core of retribalising and rewilding. These communities can be as simple as a local residents association, a gardening group or similar. As long as it’s local and small, it is sowing the seeds for a new way of organising ourselves. As the economic, resource and ecological crisis begin to hit, it is our job to get these groups to take an ever increasing interest and duty in caring and caretaking for its local area. If many small communities do this, a network can form to take care of our own needs without relying on the current system and its government so much.

So here’s how to begin the implementation of real democracy: see governments for what they really are – mechanisms to keep us in our place; join and form small, local groups in your area with a concern for that area; create a group which for example takes turns to give a Permaculture makeover to each of your gardens and local area and swaps seeds, tools etc.; network with other similar groups and encourage their development; and finally consider alternative economies to support these new networks. This is a new and untested plan, but could eventually lead to the emergence of a completely different way for people to organise themselves outside of the hierarchical/slave system – a true democracy as practiced for hundreds of generations before civilisation.

Share

Local Currencies – Wörgl in the Great Depression

As the economic crisis deepens and it becomes ever more clear that we are heading into a depression, it is useful to study the previous depression of the thirties to learn from history. The most inspiring story of people coming together to overcome the troubles is the Austrian town of Wörgl, which in 1932 issued a local currency to complete public works projects with and encourage trade and employment:

The mayor, Michael Unterguggenberger, had a long list of projects he wanted to accomplish, but there was hardly any money with which to carry them out. These included repaving the roads, streetlighting, extending water distribution across the whole town, and planting trees along the streets.Rather than spending the 40,000 Austrian schillings in the town’s coffers to start these projects off, he deposited them in a local savings bank as a guarantee to back the issue of and a type of complimentary currency known as ‘stamp scrip’. This requires a monthly stamp to be stuck on all the circulating notes for them to remain valid, and in Wörgl, the stamp amounted 1% of the each note’s value. The money raised was used to run a soup kitchen that fed 220 families.Because nobody wanted to pay what was effectively a hoarding fee, everyone receiving the notes would spend them as fast as possible. The 40,000 schilling deposit allowed anyone to exchange scrip for 98 per cent of its value in schillings. This offer was rarely taken up though.

Of all the business in town, only the railway station and the post office refused to accept the local money. When people ran out of spending ideas, they would pay their taxes early using scrip, resulting in a huge increase in town revenues. Over the 13-month period the project ran, the council not only carried out all the intended works projects, but also built new houses, a reservoir, a ski jump, and a bridge. The people also used scrip to replant forests, in anticipation of the future cashflow they would receive from the trees.

The key to its success was the fast circulation of scrip within the local economy, 14 times higher than the schilling. This in turn increased trade, creating extra employment. At the time of the project, Wörgl was the only Austrian town to achieve full employment

By issuing a local currency whose value decays rather than grows as in the current system of virtual debt, the town could create a vibrant local economy despite the crisis.  As its value decreased and hoarding was counter-productive, if practiced on a wider scale it would promote sustainibility – the problems of growth can be avoided.  However, the state did not like the idea:

At this point, the central bank panicked, and decided to assert its monopoly rights by banning complimentary currencies. The people unsuccessfully sued the bank, and later lost in the Austrian Supreme Court. It then became a criminal offence to issue ‘emergency currency’.

Unterguggenberger was opposed to both communism and fascism, championing instead what he referred to as ‘economic freedom’. Therefore, it was deeply ironic that the Wörgl experiment was first branded ‘craziness’ by the monetary authorities, then a Communist idea, and some years later as a fascist one.

The town went back to 30% unemployment. In 1934, social unrest exploded across Austria. In 1938, when Hitler annexed Austria, he was welcomed by many people as their economic and political saviour.

By challenging the banksters that effectively control the front organisation known as the state, this small town’s success became an example of how to run our own affairs.  Sensing the threat to their power this could create if adopted by other communities, it was crushed.  The state would rather let its citizens become unemployed and impoverished rather than let them create their own reality.  As a result, fascism could sweep across the country as a ‘solution’ to the crisis, welcomed by the banksters as a way to tighten their control.

We need to learn from history – as the crisis worsens we need to set up projects like this in every community, village, town and city to take back the economy, and when the inevitable crackdown comes as we threaten the power of the banksters we need to resist and enact civil disobedience.  If we don’t, the banksters will continue to rule us and impoverish us, from taking our taxes in bailout plans in this ‘democracy’ (did we get to vote on this plan, or was it chosen for us?) through to outright fascism.

Something as simple as our local own currencies can diminish the banksters and states power over us – they knew it in 1933, and they know it today.  We can use money as a tool for dismantling civilisation, to serve people and planet rather than be its master.  I call on all local environmental groups – transition towns, climate groups, campaign groups etc. – to investigate setting up local currencies and credit unions and consider it a vital part of making our world a better place.

Share