Dismantle Civilisation Rotating Header Image

health

how to avoid genetically modified foods

from WikiHow.

and care2.com

and eco childs play

and Norfolk Gentic Information Network 

Go organic – organic foods should not contain any GM ingredients. Those bearing the Soil Association symbol are certified not to do so. Supermarkets are improving their range all the time in response to growing consumer demand, much of it in response to GM food. For information on sourcing locally grown organic food in Norfolk, including vegetable box deliveries, contact norfolk organic gardeners

Avoid soya and soya-based ingredients such as soya flour, soya oil, ‘vegetable oil’, lecithin and hydrolysed vegetable protein, unless you know they are GM free, and try and avoid maize-based ingredients such as modified starch, cornflour, corn starch, corn oil and polenta.

Other tips: Avoid margarine unless it clearly states it is GM free, and avoid oils which state “vegetable oil” or “cooking oil” on the label. Where you can, avoid “low budget” products as these are more likely to contain GM ingredients.

50 harmful effects of genetically modified foods by Nathan Batalion.

Health dangers of genetically modified foods:

Share

the truth about homeopathy: dispelling the MYTHS that surround it

Don’t believe in homoeopathy? Perhaps this article on Rense.com will change your mind.

We include it here because it is a system of medicine that looks at the person as a whole, in the same way that we argue that the planet should be regarded as a complete living entity.  You can’t seperate symptoms from emotions, lifestyle from sickness – in the same way that we shouldn’t seperate economics from spirituality, human habitation from the forest that the planet needs to survive. Homoeopathy and other wholistic medicine needs to be accepted as mainstream healthcare – its part of the mindset and cultural change that humanity needs to embrace if we want to continue living on this amazing planet.

The body is always intelligent. That is why the human race has survived. When a baby is conceived, Nature chooses the best genes from both parents in order to create a stronger, healthier human.
If the parents are both taking drugs of any kind, whether legal or illegal, the health of the baby will be compromised.

If only doctors and scientists would study Nature, they would find all the answers and instead of going against it, learn from it.
There is only one true science and that is the science of Nature.

The human race has survived because we all have an innate healing power in our bodies. In homeopathy for example, this is called the Vital Force. Homeopathy stimulates the vital force to heal the body, through like for like (using a potentised substance that would cause the symptoms but in a tiny dose acts as a catalyst for healing).

So in conclusion, there is no question that dismissing cures as Anecdotal Evidence through the use of natural medicine, is nothing more than a whitewashand a desperate means of suppressing the knowledge of those cures to the public as a whole.

Share

public health and welfare

An excerpt from Sharon Astyk’s book, Depletion and Abundance:

If we were to ask “Where do we need energy the most?” we would get a very different answer. Perhaps the most bang for our fossil-fueled buck comes in health care. In fact, when anyone suggests moving to a much lower-energy society, the most disturbing and frightening thing for them to imagine losing is usually health care. When we talk about the changing economy, the question that most immediately jumps up is “What will we do about health insurance?” The shift here — from medical care to insurance — is a telling one, because right now medical care is so costly that almost no one can afford to pay for it outright. And yet, medical care in and of itself does not have to be as expensive as it is for us. The French, who arguably have the best medical system in the world, spend only half what we do.

In the coming changes, the most important things will be making sure that people can live simpler, lower-energy lives without unbearable costs. That means keeping infant mortality low and lifespans long. It means stabilizing population. As we’ve seen, to a large degree decisions about how many children to have are based on expectations of those children’s survival. In a society with a great deal of uncertainty about the future of children, we can expect rising, rather than falling birthrates.

Along with access to education and basic social welfare programs such as support for the elderly and disabled and food price stabilization, I would argue that one of the most urgent projects we can engage in is in finding a way to maintain the benefits of modern medicine in a low-energy society. And as I research this problem, I increasingly believe that this can be accomplished, that we have the resources to create a low-energy national health care — or, if our government will not lead on such a project, that states, regions or even communities can enable such a health care model.

sharon points out that there are 3 health care myths.

1. More health care is better, and good health care must be expensive.

2. The benefits of modern medicine always outweigh the costs

3. Social good programs like health care are things you get to later rather than sooner.

Too much interventionist healthcare can be detrimental to health. Staying healthy with a good diet and sensible lifestyle is far easier and cheaper than sorting out the problems caused by a poor diet or lifestyle. Unfortunately good health advice does not make money like treatments, pills and interventions do. Conspiracy theorists could be forgiven for thinking that our society deliberately makes us ill and then sells us products to make us better. Perhaps some parts of the industrial medical industry is controlled by people without consciences, who deliberately sell toxic foods, release poisons and promote unhealthy lifestyles, so they can then make money selling medications to us. But generally its just the notion that bigger is better, more ‘healthcare’ guarantees health, that puts us where we are. Healthy people do not need healthcare.

The Amish are another important example. Amish people in the US have a number of factors that would seem to place them at risk of higher infant mortality rates and lower lifespans — they receive little preventive care, eat a high-fat diet, have no health insurance, use herbal and home remedies first, and give birth to most of their children at home, using lay midwives. And yet the average Amish lifespan is virtually the same as that of the average non-Amish American, despite their spending one fifth or less on health care.

All of these examples demonstrate the simple truth that, although hospitals and medical care are energy intensive, it is not impossible to dramatically reduce our need for expensive, energy intensive medical care by prioritizing health and general welfare.

Most of the world manage without all this high energy expensive medical care – we are going to find ourselves having to manage without it soon. If we start looking at local low energy health care options now, the transition may be easier.

Share