Dismantle Civilisation Rotating Header Image

selfsufficiency

Cooking with the Sun

The Solar Cooking Archive has collected a large array of various solar cooker designs. They’re low-tech, can be built easily out of fairly common waste from industrial civilisation, and can cook food and pasteurise water without any fossil fuels involved.

Although they do take longer to heat up than a conventional oven (a matter of hours rather than minutes as were used to), and will take longer in temperate climes, they’re worthwhile as if the grid collapsed, having these plans tucked away could be a life-saver.

I can’t reccomend any yet as I can’t vouch for their effectiveness, but the Tyre Stove, soda bottle pasteuriser and the minimum solar box cooker look the simplest to make yet still effective.  The Rocket Stove is also worth keeping a design of, as it is an incredibly efficient way to utilise combustion, minimising fuel requirements to twigs and even scraps of cardboard.  A Rocket Stove is particularly suitable in climates which get too cold in winter to allow efficient solar cooking.

It would be wise to keep a collection of plans of useful, low-tech and essential pieces of easily constructed kit like these, and even better to practice building them before it becomes an issue of survival.  I intend to attempt some of these designs and post the results and my experiences here to guide others.  It’s a fun, hands-on way of preparing for collapse and dismantling civilisation!

Share

Ceramic and Rocket Stoves – more heat for less wood

Ceramic Stoves (example of a Ceramic Stove), or Kakkelovn, were first designed in Scandinavia in 1767, and have been a feature of homes and palaces ever since. Using some ingenious designing, a fairly small amount of wood can heat a room (or several) for 24 hours.

What makes it so efficient is that the wood is burnt around 1000 degrees Celsius, which is enough to ensure the only combustion products are steam and carbon dioxide as all the smoke is burnt off too. A metal stove would be damaged at this temperature, and so has to burn at a lower, more inefficient temperature. The flue gases from this hot burn are then diverted into several channels in the masonry body above the stove, with the flames and gases travelling up and down 3 times before exiting in the chimney. By this time the gases are below 200 degrees, having lost most of the heat into the masonry bulk. From a 1 – 2 hour burn, the whole stove will radiate heat for 24 hours. They’re also not bad to look at!

It is well worth considering to use one of these of you’re building or renovating a house with sustainability in mind – one of these stoves would require in Britain between 300 and 400 willows at 2m spacing on a short rotation coppice, so around an acre or a bit less for those with land to spare. It’s not recommended to build one yourself – they’re fairly complex to get built right! A company like the Ceramic Stove Company in Oxford or similar are experienced in installing them, although in future it would be beneficial if local craftsmen knew how to build these and install them en masse.

For the rest of us and for cooking, a smaller Rocket Stove might be more appropriate. These also burn a small amount of wood – often twigs or waste – at very high temperatures to achieve maximum efficiency. Designed for arid countries with little fuel and with problems of smoke on homes, they can be built small and simple or more complex depending on the situation, as long as a few principles of dimensions are observed. This is a good site to start, but there are plenty of other variations (such as this camping version) on the internet.

If we are to survive and adapt to tough times coming as civilisation declines, we need these sort of ingenious designs, in this case for heating and cooking, to make the best use of scarce resources, and make as little impact as possible on the earth.

Share

dances with wood: life with my cookstove

Very informative article from Sharon Astyk about wood-fired cook stoves.

Why choose a cookstove? We have both a cookstove and a heating stove, although they only run simultaneously on unusually cold days or when we have guests enough to need to heat the whole house. During much of the year, the cookstove is our primary heat source, particularly in the early spring and late autumn, when the worst of winter’s cold abates, but it is still chilly enough to need a source of heat. We haven’t yet started the stove for the autumn this year – since wood smoke is polluting, we try not to use it when it isn’t truly necessary. But I’m looking forward to going back to dancing with wood.

If you are trying to decide whether to buy a cookstove or a conventional heating stove, it is worth considering what your priorities are. Do you already live in a climate where you can use a solar oven or outdoor masonry oven most of the time (ie, somewhere sunny, fairly dry and warm?) Then you probably don’t need a cookstove. Do you have trees on your property or lots of sustainably harvested and carefully managed forest in the area, so that wood makes sense at all?

Do you cook much? Can or preserve? If you live alone and rarely cook, I would go for the more efficient wood heating stove – remember, you can cook on one of those as well – you can put a pot of soup on the top of the stove, and even get or make a sheet metal oven to go on top of it that will allow you to bake. It isn’t as precise, easy to control or as large a surface, but it can be done. On the other hand, if you live in a large household, preserve a lot and cook from scratch most of the time, a big flat hot surface and oven going all the time might be a huge blessing. Also, where does your cooking energy come from? If you are cooking now with coal powered electric, replacing that stove with a cookstove might make a big dent in your emissions.

How much is cost an issue? What kind of stoves are available to you? New cookstoves are often a bit more expensive than new conventional woodstoves of similar heating ability. If buying an older stove, be careful with what you are buying – older stoves of both kinds may be heavily polluting and inefficient. Used stoves are often available, but make sure you know what you are getting, and that they check out for a good tight gasket seal and are in good condition. Also think about the costs and impacts of the wood you are using. If you live in a forested area, or can manage your own woodlot or track how wood is harvested locally, wood might make sense. In an area without a lot of woodland, where wood has to be trucked long distances, perhaps a stove using another fuel would be wiser. Many woodstoves can be adapted to use pellets or corn, but I’m not aware of a pellet/corn basket that would fit the smaller firebox of a cookstove – although such a thing may well exist.

How often are you prepared to tend things? A cookstove necessarily has a smaller firebox than most woodstoves, simply because a lot of the space available is used for the oven – so while some stoves can be banked and kept going overnight, many cookstoves can’t. Certainly, when you are cooking, if you need precise temperatures, you’ll find that you need to be able to be around, to feed the stove more often and keep an eye on things – it isn’t quite like setting the oven to 350 and walking away. It probably doesn’t require as much attention as you assume it does, but it does require more than electric or gas. Also, are you prepared to learn how to keep your chimneys clean, prevent fires, cut wood, etc…

Finally, how worried are you about having a source of heat and cooking power that doesn’t require electricity or natural gas. Since we have regular power outages in our rural neighborhood anyway, it is just commonsense not to depend on the electric lines for our heat (our oil furnace requires electricity to be used) or cooking. If you aren’t worried about your fossil fuel supplies, or have a better, more locally appropriate alternative, maybe a cookstove isn’t for you. The same would be true, even if you have these worries, if you don’t expect to be home to check on the stove regularly.

Hopefully, anyone switching to wood heating and cooking will remember the all important tree planting. Trees we plant now will be our wood supplies in 20 years plus. Think ahead!

Share

The Responsibility of Complexity

Having just spent a slow-paced week in the woods learning the basics of the art of bushcraft, the return to civilisation has been somewhat disorientating.  Many things bothered my mind on my return, from the urban noises to the claustrophobia of the buildings and the density of people.  But the main underlying cause of this unease was the jump from very simple living on what nature provides compared to the massively complex way of life currently gripping humanity.

 

From dawn to dusk in each of our western lives, we use objects and energy derived from far-off places via many hands to bring it here.  The very houses we live in, the manner in which we transport ourselves, the food we eat and how we cook it, it’s all provided for us with us having very little control of it.  The raw materials for even the most simplest tool is shipped from abroad to be manufactured and distributed to us via a huge network.  Very few things can be said to have come from our own hands or from the local environment.

 

Compared to bushcraft, the level of complexity is huge.  Although still using some basic tools from civilization, the abundance of nature was clear to see in its ability to provide for fairly comfortable human existence.  Food, medicine, tools, shelter – all could be found and made usable by oneself.  The realisation of how difficult it was to provide these very basic needs in the middle of a huge selection of resources brought home how disempowered we are in this way of life, unable to provide for our needs without the massive life-support machine of civilisation.

 

How could we survive without the life-support system though?  Using bushcraft in the woods is no doubt very useful, but it is impossible for the current population to survive off the relatively few tracts of unabused land for long without destroying them too.  This is where Permaculture comes in, in its ability to take the abused land and rewild it with humans and biodiversity in mind.  By designing the recovery of the land, we can live off the land with very little impact.  Although the earth will regenerate in time after humans, if we wish to survive too we need to give all the assistance we can in accelerating this process before any more damage is done.

 

This is all necessary to reduce the complexity of our lives and thus reduce its destructive impacts on the earth and ourselves.  It is hard to suddenly ‘drop-out’ of civilisation though, and this must be done gradually for the majority of us.  In the meantime we must take responsibility of the complexity.  If you drive a car, do you really currently need it?  If not, remove it from your life, if you do then keep it, but only if you accept the consequences of that and commit to eventually being able to finally change.  The same can be applied to everything in our lives, to every object and activity that depends upon the life-support system of civilisation.  We must slowly become independent of it, accepting what we currently need from it with the full commitment to as soon as possible to destroy these links too.

Share

sustainable food – lecture videos

Videos from the Urban Homesteaders.
Part One:

Part Two:

Part Three:

Part Four:

Share

doing more with less

Inspiration from the urban homesteaders.

With headlines about rising food costs, soaring gas prices, and skyrocketing foreclosure rates that reach directly into everyone’s wallets, as well as sobering reports about the state of the earth’s environment, there is mounting pressure for some relief. The question arises: How can an individual or one family cope in such trying times?

When I was confronted with the anxieties of living in the turbulent years of the late 1960s and early 1970s, I started searching for a way out by looking at alternative answers for how best to provide for my family. My desire was for us to be healthy and strong and to be able to live long and happy lives. I believed the only way to achieve this was to learn how to grow my own food and to live a simple lifestyle. This belief would take me on a lifelong journey. From Louisiana to New Zealand, to Florida, and then to Southern California, it was a long, winding, and difficult road.

In 2000, GMOs were introduced into the food chain by large corporations. Perceiving this to be a crisis threatening the health and survival of my family, I reacted radically. To ensure that my food supply was safe, I took matters into my own hands, trying to grow as much of my own food as possible. This project became my “Path to Freedom.”

In the midst of the urban wilderness of Los Angeles County, in downtown Pasadena, with the help of my adult children, I continued to turn my city lot into an urban homestead, fanatically planting every available space to the four corners of our small world. After much manual labor, my property would be transformed into a wildlife sanctuary, a home to citified barnyard animals, and a petite paradise where over 400 species of flora have been grown.

During the summer, up to 90 percent of my family’s vegetarian diet comes from our garden. Not only do we have the assurance of knowing where our food comes from and the satisfaction of having grown it ourselves, we enjoy produce that is unbeatably healthful and tasty. The days of having others sow, grow, harvest, and deliver to the grocery store our family’s food were gone, at least for a large percentage of our diet.

Later, we would further push for more freedom by tackling our energy usage on a variety of fronts. From simple steps such as installing CFLs, using only energy efficient/Energy Star appliances, and not using a clothes dryer, to more radical steps of forgoing electrical appliances altogether and installing solar panels, we reduced our average daily usage from 10.6 kwh to 6.0 kwh and produce much of that energy through our solar panels.

We addressed the transportation energy problem by owning only one car (a 1988 diesel Suburban) for a family of four adults; cutting back on the number of trips made; and learning how to brew biodiesel in our garage from waste vegetable oil. Our fuel costs about $1.00 per gallon. A future step planned is to cut back further on water usage.

What we have accomplished and the freedom we have gained was by way of manageable stages, along with incremental steps, because there is no quick fix. Path to Freedom has taken the vanguard position in order to incite change and to be an example of the possibilities. Today, more and more green options are widely available for the average person. Because not everyone can employ all these extreme measures at once, the question narrows down to: What can you do, where you are, with what you have, right now?

We must start by building on foundational principles in order to construct a bright future out of bleak conditions. A prerequisite principle is that of sacrifice. We must be prepared to sacrifice to achieve results and, also, to stay the course over the long haul, because no dream of any worth can be realized cheaply.

Given the bad news coming from both scientists and economists, a new direction is required, that of living lightly on the earth. We must be willing to cut back—cut back on the amount and type of travel we do; lower the amount of energy we use to heat or cool our houses; and reduce the number of single-use items we buy. Practice thrift: use it up, wear it out, or make it do. In the end, we might just have to do without. By making small sacrifices now, we will be much better prepared to face any difficult circumstances later.

Another principle, worth bringing back from bygone eras, is that of self-reliance or “do-it-yourself.” One of the reasons I started growing my own food was that I wanted the benefits of eating organic vegetables and fruit, but I couldn’t afford to buy them in the grocery store. People searching for true stability can find it in the empowerment and fulfillment that comes from learning the basic skills of providing for oneself. The future depends on our developing the old-fashioned virtue of independence and exercising faith in the power of the “common man.”

These principles, in order to be implemented, must be backed by passion—the passion of truly, deeply caring for our families and for our home, earth. Because, let’s face it. Our world is in deep, deep trouble and we are the “troublemakers.” We have to make real, difficult changes yesterday. Despite the obvious benefits, we are not going to recycle, compost, or talk our way out of this. Our leaders, being politicians, are not leaders at all but are bound to be followers, who just won’t be there for us in a crisis. So, it’s up to me and you to make the choice of becoming responsible stewards of the earth.

Let’s turn the world right side up. Join us on our journey towards a sustainable present and future. Let’s walk the path to freedom!

Share

what have you done today towards food and energy independence?

Sharon Astyk has inspired many people to think about and work towards food and energy independence. Most of us have so much to learn, having been raised from supermarkets and the global economy. Sharon’s weekly updates is a very useful idea, breaking up the mammoth task of learning how to support ourselves into a series of questions. Obviously not all of us can learn everything. Perhaps by following Sharons lead, and meeting with our neighbours to discuss ‘Independence Days’ together, a level of co-operation, mutual aid and local specialisation can be found at the street or village level. Money is losing its value fast, but useful skills once learned will increase in value to ourselves and our communities as the economy continues to crash. So much to do, so little time – if only people had listened to the peak oil ‘prophets’ back in the 70s!

Planted something.
Harvested something.
Preserved something.
Cooked something new.
Managed reserves.
Prepped something.
Minimized waste.
Learned A New Skill.

What have you done today towards food and energy independence?
grow your own

Share

practical permaculture in Britain

Part One:

Part Two:

Part Three:

Part Four:

Part Five:

Part Six:

Share

eat the weeds

Green Dean has a whole series on YouTUBE, and his own blog website. Very interesting.

Share

rice on the roof – how to use grey water for growing paddy

Share